Chapter 6: Interactivity

6.1 Boalian perspectives on interactivity in theatre

By John Somers (pp. 148-156)

interactivity
interactivity
  • “(…) Fiction is vitally important – indeed we may live more by fiction than by fact. It is living by fiction which makes the higher organisms special” (Gregory, in Roses 1985:16)
  • Boal’s principal contribution [to interactive theatre] was to remove the “fourth wall”, which in most theatre forms through time had clearly separated audience and actor spaces.
  • The artist may make forays into the auditorium or invite audience members into their space. Typically, this happens when magicians or stand-up comedians perform. They can see and talk directly to the audience.
  • Key areas of concern:
    1. Sincerity: where an audience is invited to become involved in the affairs of performed characters, they need to feel that they will not be taken advantage of
    2. Targeting: interactive theatre is often targeted at specific, generally homogenous groups
    3. Authenticity: the programme developers have to conduct rigorous research on the topic they wish to deal with
    4. Relevance: the research should also reveal what the target group will find relevant to their personal or professional lives.
    5. Validation: audience members are more likely to become engaged with the story if it validates their experience
    6. Audience size: the audience numbers are restricted; it is more difficult to engage the moral concern of very large groups
  • The style of acting used in interactive theatre may be highly naturalistic. Actors must remain alert and respond in role to audience demands and suggestions.

 

6.2 Interactivity at the work of Blast Theory

 

Matt Adams in conversation with Alice O’Grady (pp.156-165)

 

“Interactive work has to be unfinished”

-Brian Eno

 

Pitches, J., and Popat, S. (ed.) (2011) Performance Perspectives: A Critical Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan

6.3 Interactivity: functions and risks

By Alice O’Grady (pp. 165-173)

 

  • In a performance setting, there exists the potential for a number of different channels of interaction. Interaction may occur
    between artists
    between artists and audience
    between the artist/ audience member and a computer system
  • Steve Dixon (2007:563) offers four categories of interaction:

Steve Dixon

  • In interactive theatre, performances are usually planned or structured in a very tight manner, but with great gaps to allow for interaction to take place.
    The work cannot progress without audience involvement.

 

Pitches, J., and Popat, S. (ed.) (2011) Performance Perspectives: A Critical Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan

Chapter 4

By Tony Gardner

 

Time in performance is not under the control of its audience: live performance can neither be rewound nor paused for later viewing,
the experience of it cannot be slowed down or speeded up by its audience.

chapter 4

Pitches, J., and Popat, S. (ed.) (2011) Performance Perspectives: A Critical Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan

4.1 Theatre, technology and time

By Steve Dixon (pp. 89-97)

 

  • Atemporal: a negatively configured “non-time” of contemporary experience
  • Highly stylized and ritualized “acting” performances, slow-motion movements and repetitions all contribute to a sense of time’s manipulation and disruption.
  • Henri Bergson: “what I call “my present” has one foot in my past, and another in the future”.

 

Pitches, J., and Popat, S. (ed.) (2011) Performance Perspectives: A Critical Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan

4.2 Ghost dance: time and duration in the work of Lone Twin

Gregg Wheelan in conversation with Tony Gardner (pp. 97-102)

  • The use of video and other digital technologies to manipulate the passage of time in contemporary media performance can create a sense of the extemporal,
    or “time out of time”.
  • Durational works can mark out and frame a special time in the ongoing flow of the everyday as a privileged space of performance.
  • Marina Abramovic has spoken about creating a special kind of time through her durational pieces, arguing that
    artist and spectator must “meet in a completely new territory, and build from that timeless time spent together”.
  • It is dramatic to end something that has been going on for what is largely considered a long time.
    But the idea of an ending does create something of heightened sense of being together.
  • Giving something a lot of time allows for all sorts of things to happen – it creates an opening, a field of possibilities.

 

Pitches, J., and Popat, S. (ed.) (2011) Performance Perspectives: A Critical Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan