Tuesday, 13 February

Today it was a very productive day.

I had my first rehearsal with my dancers on the piece “Body Pressure”, one of the Seven Easy Pieces of Marina Abramovic. Though it might seem really nothing, the dancers reached what I wanted them to understand: pushing against a wall can become easier, more exhaustive and more natural all in the same moment. As they told me, they felt good towards the end. This is good… Because they are going to be repeating it hundreds of times!

Also, afterwards we had an Examining Choreography class, where we performed our own scores inspired by the Seven Easy Pieces. I chose the “How to explain pictures to a dead hare”.

Jamie, my classmate, performed a piece inspired by “Conditioning” and it was interesting because we participated, too. I had to tape his feet on the wall. It was very creative for me and I was feeling I had to make many decisions, as to where to put the tape, if I hurt Jamie, how fast to do it… Because I was running out of time.

28035276_10208777767880694_618024427_o

In the end of the class, Kayla Bowtell, our teacher, gave us her score on “Body Pressure” and “Seedbed”. She gave us two eggs and was giving us tasks: tie the egg on your heal, move forward, find each other with your eyes closed, look at each other with your eyes closed, now look at each other at your own time, start using Body Pressure based on the text (where Jamie was pushing me with so much strength, I really feel my back ache!), then we had to rest on/in each other, create 3 poses for each other’s body and repeat 30 times and when we finish, sit down and look at each other, move the chairs towards or far from each other and then the Body Pressure text was on again. So exhausting…

But, I can feel so inspired today. It is amazing what bodies can do, if you don’t tell them to dance, but to just push or use their minds for their bodies! I, also, feel changed. Like I gave a fatal punch to a brick wall of limitations in my mind.

Chapter 6: Interactivity

6.1 Boalian perspectives on interactivity in theatre

By John Somers (pp. 148-156)

interactivity
interactivity
  • “(…) Fiction is vitally important – indeed we may live more by fiction than by fact. It is living by fiction which makes the higher organisms special” (Gregory, in Roses 1985:16)
  • Boal’s principal contribution [to interactive theatre] was to remove the “fourth wall”, which in most theatre forms through time had clearly separated audience and actor spaces.
  • The artist may make forays into the auditorium or invite audience members into their space. Typically, this happens when magicians or stand-up comedians perform. They can see and talk directly to the audience.
  • Key areas of concern:
    1. Sincerity: where an audience is invited to become involved in the affairs of performed characters, they need to feel that they will not be taken advantage of
    2. Targeting: interactive theatre is often targeted at specific, generally homogenous groups
    3. Authenticity: the programme developers have to conduct rigorous research on the topic they wish to deal with
    4. Relevance: the research should also reveal what the target group will find relevant to their personal or professional lives.
    5. Validation: audience members are more likely to become engaged with the story if it validates their experience
    6. Audience size: the audience numbers are restricted; it is more difficult to engage the moral concern of very large groups
  • The style of acting used in interactive theatre may be highly naturalistic. Actors must remain alert and respond in role to audience demands and suggestions.

 

6.2 Interactivity at the work of Blast Theory

 

Matt Adams in conversation with Alice O’Grady (pp.156-165)

 

“Interactive work has to be unfinished”

-Brian Eno

 

Pitches, J., and Popat, S. (ed.) (2011) Performance Perspectives: A Critical Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan

6.3 Interactivity: functions and risks

By Alice O’Grady (pp. 165-173)

 

  • In a performance setting, there exists the potential for a number of different channels of interaction. Interaction may occur
    between artists
    between artists and audience
    between the artist/ audience member and a computer system
  • Steve Dixon (2007:563) offers four categories of interaction:

Steve Dixon

  • In interactive theatre, performances are usually planned or structured in a very tight manner, but with great gaps to allow for interaction to take place.
    The work cannot progress without audience involvement.

 

Pitches, J., and Popat, S. (ed.) (2011) Performance Perspectives: A Critical Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan

Chapter 4

By Tony Gardner

 

Time in performance is not under the control of its audience: live performance can neither be rewound nor paused for later viewing,
the experience of it cannot be slowed down or speeded up by its audience.

chapter 4

Pitches, J., and Popat, S. (ed.) (2011) Performance Perspectives: A Critical Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan

4.1 Theatre, technology and time

By Steve Dixon (pp. 89-97)

 

  • Atemporal: a negatively configured “non-time” of contemporary experience
  • Highly stylized and ritualized “acting” performances, slow-motion movements and repetitions all contribute to a sense of time’s manipulation and disruption.
  • Henri Bergson: “what I call “my present” has one foot in my past, and another in the future”.

 

Pitches, J., and Popat, S. (ed.) (2011) Performance Perspectives: A Critical Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan